SYNAPSE Journal of Healthcare Innovation & Future Technologies is fully dedicated to ensuring that publication ethics, academic integrity, and transparency remain at the highest level. SYNAPSE employs all ethical practices in its publications to ensure that every manuscript is handled objectively, fairly, and confidentially. These principles should be maintained by authors, reviewers, and editors during the whole publishing process.

Responsibilities of Authors

Authors should:

• Submit original and unpublished work.
• Ensure the manuscript is not under review elsewhere.
• Present research honestly and accurately.
• Properly acknowledge all sources.
• Avoid plagiarism and duplicate publication.
• Obtain permission for copyrighted material where required.
• Ensure all authors approve the final manuscript.
• Disclose conflicts of interest.
• Acknowledge funding sources.
• Report significant errors after publication if identified.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:

• Conduct fair and objective reviews.
• Maintain confidentiality.
• Provide constructive and professional feedback.
• Evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit.
• Declare conflicts of interest.
• Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe.
• Report any ethical concerns to the editor.

Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for:

• Making impartial editorial decisions.
• Maintaining confidentiality.
• Selecting qualified reviewers.
• Ensuring editorial independence.
• Addressing ethical concerns promptly.
• Upholding the quality and integrity of published research.
• Promoting fairness, transparency, and academic excellence.

Editorial decisions are based solely on the quality, originality, and relevance of the submitted work.

Academic Integrity & Research Misconduct

SYNAPSE maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward unethical publishing practices. All submitted manuscripts must demonstrate honesty, originality, and responsible research conduct.

The journal does not accept:

• Plagiarism
• Duplicate publication
• Data fabrication or falsification
• Simultaneous submissions
• Improper authorship
• Citation manipulation
• Undisclosed conflicts of interest
• Any form of research misconduct

In case there is evidence of unethical behavior, the journal can reject the article, ask for corrections, issue retractions where necessary, or make other suitable editorial interventions.

SYNAPSE aims at ensuring that the integrity of scientific publishing is preserved through the promotion of responsible research, good practices and professional standards throughout the entire publishing process.